In March 2020, when much of the media felt on the brink of collapse, Insider was one place that seemed upbeat.
The digital outlet best known for its headline-clicking tech and business news — produced at breakneck speed and funded by Axel Springer — was about to launch a brand new Beltway team focused on original reporting, a departure from insiders aggregation-centric model.
"Our goal is to be the most popular and influential journalism brand in the world," Insider Editor-in-Chief Nicholas Carlson wrote in apress releasefor the new office headed by Darren SamuelsohnPolitically's senior White House reporter. "Today we announce a big step in this direction."
Nearly three years later, almost the entire team at the original Washington, D.C., office has relocated. disappeared. Samuelsohn was fired just days before the 2022 election, and a steady stream of employees has resigned over the past year. Insider's plan to revamp its political coverage turned out to be "one of the wildest rides" in political media, a former staffer explained.
The Daily Beast spoke to 10 current and former members of Insider's political team, who all described conflicting editorial directions, poor management, and ever-shifting goals - all of which contributed to the general dysfunction and eventual collapse of a once-promising office. The sources were granted anonymity to speak candidly about their experiences.
"We've made a big step into DC and politics in the past few years and hired a lot of talented journalists. We are grateful to this team and proud of their coverage," wrote an insider when asked to comment. “Your great work has garnered a lot of attention from many of our most prestigious competitors, for whom political reporting is at the core of what their audiences expect. For us, this is business and technology.”
Insider was no newcomer to politics. The newsroom already had a policy team in New York City, made up mostly of entry-level reporters who collected breaking news. Traffic was king, as the office frequently reminded employees: TV screens displayed internal analyzes prominently at all times. "You realize very early on that the way to get praise and recognition is to have a story that's really high on the chartbeat," said a former reporter.
But while New York focused on traffic, Washington was designed to generate impactful stories and win subscriptions. By August 2020, Samuelsohn assembled a team of seven, including reporters who had covered politics at CNN and the USChicago Sun-Times. By the end of the first quarter of 2021, the team had almost doubled in size.
Coverage of the January 6 Capitol riots proved an early blessing; Some reporters recalled an ease in meeting subscriber quotas. But as the Trump era faded and a far less scandalous Biden administration took hold, Insider's subscription goals soared even as audiences dwindled, staffers said. marquee stories, likea massive oral history of the uprising-- as reported by lawmakers, journalists and law enforcement officers in attendance -- fell far short of Insider's subscription goals.
"It was just demoralizing," said a former political reporter.
Further tensions fueled an issue with "too many cooks": Staffers said five top editors meddled in the bureau at any point, including Carlson himself. With each boss came differing opinions on how politics should be reported, with them often deviated from a single, coherent editorial strategy.
Additionally, staffers said, Insider Brass couldn't commit to a target audience, which confused the bureau about its goals. "I've often asked who the ideal reader is, and nobody could really describe it for me," said a former reporter. "I was just amazed most of the time there."
A bright spot in 2021 was “Controversial Congress', a team-wide, award-winning project that tracks the stock holdings of every member of Congress. Notably, it wasn't tied to any of Insider's restrictive traffic or subscriber-based goals. "It allowed us to do some of the best journalism that Insider has ever done," beamed a former senior reporter.
Do you like what you read? Subscribe to the Confider newsletterhereand get excellent coverage from The Daily Beast's media team delivered straight to your inbox every Monday night.
But more often than not, the team struggled to meet Insider's ever-changing goals. Some D.C. reporters, like their New York counterparts, have been switched to traffic-based quotas. Tying reporter success to subscriptions is "unsustainable," said a senior policy official. "The writing was clearly on the wall."
The postponement was "Darren's attempt to save the office," a former employee suggested, but it ultimately proved unsuccessful.
In March 2022, Insider merged both policy teams into one entity that hunts traffic via subscriptions -- a deeply polarizing move, staffers told The Daily Beast. Some recalled that instead of pursuing original stories, they were more often asked to pursue snappy articles written overnight by the London and Singapore teams. The stories are often wrong or mischaracterized, reporters claimed.
"It was like that for a while," said one reporter. "I found it really, really frustrating and kind of a silly way of doing journalism."
Frustration grew as management increased its focus on traffic. In May of this year, Editor-in-Chief Rebecca Harrington sent out an editorial email with instructions ranging from the innocuous ("Find the Inside Point of View") to the explicit ("Play the Chartbeat "Game"). The memo, reviewed by The Daily Beast, angered many Washington staffers, particularly because it encouraged them to avoid topics that didn't guarantee traffic and simply "post more."
“This company was built on blogging! We still love it!” Harrington wrote.
The approach became, as a former reporter put it, "quantity over quality," which D.C. staffers dismissed, some openly blaming Samuelsohn. In hindsight, staff admitted he found himself in a difficult position amid Insider's ever-changing goals and micro-management. "He spent almost three years trying to figure out what worked and what didn't, and he was placed in an impossible position," said a former employee. "But it really created some kind of bad morale in the office."
Exodus followed. High-performing reporters like Adam Wren and Robin Bravender left the company in early 2022, while there was another wave of departures in the months that followed, including Kayla Epstein and Jake Lahut (now on The Daily Beast). None of the vacancies were refilled - a "evisceration through wear and tear", as several employees described it.
Finally, eleven days before the midterms, insider released Samuelsohn, according to five people familiar with the situation. No reason was given for his ouster, but staff said they were shocked by the sudden decision to pee the DC boss days before a major election.
"I think I was hired to help the company with a moon shoot," Samuelsohn wrote to The Daily Beast. "Did we make it to the moon? nope But we tried. And we've made huge strides forward.” He touted the accolades of the bureau and reporters who have since joined the outletsPoliticallyandDie Washington Post.
The firing all but confirmed to staff that Insider had become disinterested in political reporting. "We seemed even more directionless," a recent political reporter told The Daily Beast. "Because it is so,are you doing this now For real?“The team weathered the midterms under the leadership of several editors, including two deputies who would also depart by the end of the year.
It's unclear where insider politics will go from here. An insider spokesman insisted the outlet still plans to cover politics. However, the employees do not yet know what that will look like.
"I don't know what Insider wants, and I don't know if Insider knows what it wants," said a recent political reporter.
Subscribe to somethingconfidant, the Daily Beast's media newsletter, and get juicy news in your inbox every week.